lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 26 Jun 2018 16:00:33 +0900
From:   Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
To:     Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:     Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        syzkaller-bugs <syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com>,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        syzbot <syzbot+d29d18215e477cfbfbdd@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NFC: llcp: fix nfc_llcp_send_ui_frame() lockup

On (06/25/18 23:44), Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > The loop is still infinite, correct, but we have a preemption point now.
> > Sure, net people can come with a much better solution, I'll be happy to
> > scratch my patch.
> > 
> 
> This can not be the right solution, think about current thread being real time,
> cond_resched() might be a nop.
> NFC maintainers should really take a look at this.

I'm all for it.

	-ss

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ