[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jL-_o0mQGzWoOg5VHj0sUfrkDH-yrOg0A3BxQRe+VRmDw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2018 11:44:23 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>,
RDMA mailing list <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
Hadar Hen Zion <hadarh@...lanox.com>,
Matan Barak <matanb@...lanox.com>,
Michael J Ruhl <michael.j.ruhl@...el.com>,
Noa Osherovich <noaos@...lanox.com>,
Raed Salem <raeds@...lanox.com>,
Yishai Hadas <yishaih@...lanox.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
linux-netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next 08/12] overflow.h: Add arithmetic shift helper
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 11:10 AM, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com> wrote:
> Leon? Seems like agreement, Can you work with this version?
>
> #include <stdint.h>
> #include <stdbool.h>
> #include <assert.h>
>
> #define u64 uint64_t
>
> /*
> * Compute *d = (a << s)
> *
> * Returns true if '*d' cannot hold the result or 'a << s' doesn't make sense.
> * - 'a << s' causes bits to be lost when stored in d
> * - 's' is garbage (eg negative) or so large that a << s is guarenteed to be 0
> * - 'a' is negative
> * - 'a << s' sets the sign bit, if any, in '*d'
> * *d is not defined if false is returned.
> */
> #define check_shift_overflow(a, s, d) \
> ({ \
> typeof(a) _a = a; \
> typeof(s) _s = s; \
> typeof(d) _d = d; \
> u64 _a_full = _a; \
> unsigned int _to_shift = \
> _s >= 0 && _s < 8 * sizeof(*d) ? _s : 0; \
> \
> *_d = (_a_full << _to_shift); \
> \
> (_to_shift != _s || *_d < 0 || _a < 0 || \
> (*_d >> _to_shift) != a); \
> })
>
> int main(int argc, const char *argv[])
> {
> int32_t s32;
> uint32_t u32;
>
> assert(check_shift_overflow(1, 0, &s32) == false && s32 == (1 << 0));
> assert(check_shift_overflow(1, 1, &s32) == false && s32 == (1 << 1));
> assert(check_shift_overflow(1, 30, &s32) == false && s32 == (1 << 30));
> assert(check_shift_overflow(1, 31, &s32) == true);
> assert(check_shift_overflow(1, 32, &s32) == true);
> assert(check_shift_overflow(-1, 1, &s32) == true);
> assert(check_shift_overflow(-1, 0, &s32) == true);
>
> assert(check_shift_overflow(1, 0, &u32) == false && u32 == (1 << 0));
> assert(check_shift_overflow(1, 1, &u32) == false && u32 == (1 << 1));
> assert(check_shift_overflow(1, 30, &u32) == false && u32 == (1 << 30));
> assert(check_shift_overflow(1, 31, &u32) == false && u32 == (1UL << 31));
> assert(check_shift_overflow(1, 32, &u32) == true);
> assert(check_shift_overflow(-1, 1, &u32) == true);
> assert(check_shift_overflow(-1, 0, &u32) == true);
>
> assert(check_shift_overflow(0xFFFFFFFF, 0, &u32) == false && u32 == (0xFFFFFFFFUL << 0));
> assert(check_shift_overflow(0xFFFFFFFF, 1, &u32) == true);
> assert(check_shift_overflow(0xFFFFFFFF, 0, &s32) == true);
> assert(check_shift_overflow(0xFFFFFFFF, 1, &s32) == true);
> }
Oh yes, please include these tests in lib/test_overflow.c too! Nice. :)
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Pixel Security
Powered by blists - more mailing lists