netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 1/1] tc-testing: initial version of tunnel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAEbXskW8g-pnXCfo+7yy0c912UaVH0yE7Nb88W+B3KFGqyEtUA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 28 Jun 2018 15:58:11 -0400
From:   Keara Leibovitz <kleib@...atatu.com>
To:     Davide Caratti <dcaratti@...hat.com>
Cc:     Lucas Bates <lucasb@...atatu.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
        Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/1] tc-testing: initial version of tunnel_key
 unit tests

>> Until I'm able to submit everything, I'd be OK with having Keara add
>> the non-zero exit codes to the teardown on her tests.  In the meantime
>> we'll get the README updated and config file added as well.
>>
>> How does this sound?
>
> it sounds good to me, but at this point we can also leave the code of
> tunnel_key as-is. there are many other items failing in this script:
>
> for act in $ACT; do
> while IFS=':' read -r id _ ; do modprobe -r act_${act} ; sleep 1 ; [ -n "$id" ] && ./tdc.py -p /home/davide/iproute2/tc/tc -e $id ; done <<EOF
> `./tdc.py -l | grep ${act}`
> EOF
> done
>
> So, it's ok for me if they are fixed all together in a series, and I
> volunteer for testing it when they land on netdev list.

Hi Davide,

I will add the non-zero exit codes and resubmit version 2 tomorrow.

Keara