[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFxMGvgDavTjeLw77XSy0pCd=GBnzzryp3=vvsQNgyzcaw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 14:16:04 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, LKP <lkp@...org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] fs: replace f_ops->get_poll_head with a static
->f_poll_head pointer
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 1:37 PM Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
>
> Speaking of obvious bogosities (a lot more so than a blocking allocation
> several calls down into helper):
>
> static __poll_t ca8210_test_int_poll(
> struct file *filp,
> struct poll_table_struct *ptable
> )
Ok, that's just garbage.
Again, this is not an excuse for changing "->poll()". This is just a
bogus driver that does stupid things.
And again, don't use this as an example of "poll must not block" The
fact is, poll() *can* block for locking and other such things, and
it's perfectly normal and ok. It just shouldn't block for IO.
I will not take any misguided patches to try to "fix" poll functions
that might block.
But I will take patches to fix bugs in drivers. In this case, I think
the fix is to just remove that crazy "wait_event_interruptible()"
entirely.
Not that anybody cares, obviously. Apparently nobody has ever noticed
how broken that poll function is.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists