[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180629110601.1a4463d1@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2018 11:06:01 +0200
From: Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, davem@...emloft.net,
Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>, jiri@...nulli.us,
jhs@...atatu.com, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com,
oss-drivers@...ronome.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Pieter Jansen van Vuuren
<pieter.jansenvanvuuren@...ronome.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 3/4] net: check tunnel option type in tunnel
flags
On Thu, 28 Jun 2018 10:05:36 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> Can we take this as a follow up through the bpf-next tree or do you
> want us to respin as part of this set?
I think BPF is a separate issue.
Jiri
Powered by blists - more mailing lists