[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87vaa1erlj.fsf@codeaurora.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2018 14:53:44 +0300
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
To: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@...aro.org>
Cc: alagusankar@...ex-india.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ath10k@...ts.infradead.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ath10k: sdio: use same endpoint id for all packets in a bundle
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org> writes:
> Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@...aro.org> writes:
>
>> All packets in a bundle should use the same endpoint id as the
>> first lookahead.
>>
>> This matches how things are done is ath6kl, however,
>> this patch can theoretically handle several bundles
>> in ath10k_sdio_mbox_rx_process_packets().
>>
>> Without this patch we get lots of errors about invalid endpoint id:
>>
>> ath10k_sdio mmc2:0001:1: invalid endpoint in look-ahead: 224
>> ath10k_sdio mmc2:0001:1: failed to get pending recv messages: -12
>> ath10k_sdio mmc2:0001:1: failed to process pending SDIO interrupts: -12
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alagu Sankar <alagusankar@...ex-india.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@...aro.org>
>
> You have Alagu's s-o-b first so that implies Alagu is the author. So
> should I add From header for Alagu and add you (Niklas) as
> Co-Developed-by? Or vice versa?
Ah, the same issue is with all three patches. So whatever we decide,
I'll do the same changes on all three.
--
Kalle Valo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists