[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56ee282a-8591-8133-d82a-b54fcde69606@intel.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2018 00:49:48 -0700
From: "Nambiar, Amritha" <amritha.nambiar@...el.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, alexander.h.duyck@...el.com,
willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com, sridhar.samudrala@...el.com,
alexander.duyck@...il.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
hannes@...essinduktion.org, tom@...bertland.com, tom@...ntonium.net
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v5 3/7] net: sock: Change tx_queue_mapping in
sock_common to unsigned short
On 6/29/2018 6:05 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Amritha Nambiar <amritha.nambiar@...el.com>
> Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2018 15:31:28 -0700
>
>> @@ -1681,17 +1681,25 @@ static inline int sk_receive_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
>>
>> static inline void sk_tx_queue_set(struct sock *sk, int tx_queue)
>> {
>> + /* sk_tx_queue_mapping accept only upto a 16-bit value */
>> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE((unsigned short)tx_queue > USHRT_MAX))
>> + return;
>> sk->sk_tx_queue_mapping = tx_queue;
>> }
>>
>> +#define NO_QUEUE_MAPPING USHRT_MAX
>
> I think you need to check ">= USHRT_MAX" since USHRT_MAX is how you
> indicate no queue.
>
Agree, I'll fix this.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists