netdev - Re: [PATCHv2 net-next 2/2] selftests: add a selftest for directed broadcast forwarding

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <fc462436-af77-2c95-ec79-6cc418ef126e@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 2 Jul 2018 09:12:25 -0600
From:   David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To:     Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>,
        network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, Davide Caratti <dcaratti@...hat.com>,
        idosch@...sch.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 net-next 2/2] selftests: add a selftest for directed
 broadcast forwarding

On 7/2/18 12:30 AM, Xin Long wrote:
> +ping_ipv4()
> +{
> +	sysctl_set net.ipv4.icmp_echo_ignore_broadcasts 0
> +	bc_forwarding_disable
> +	ping_test $h1 198.51.100.255
> +
> +	iptables -A INPUT -i vrf-r1 -p icmp -j DROP
> +	bc_forwarding_restore
> +	bc_forwarding_enable
> +	ping_test $h1 198.51.100.255
> +
> +	bc_forwarding_restore
> +	iptables -D INPUT -i vrf-r1 -p icmp -j DROP
> +	sysctl_restore net.ipv4.icmp_echo_ignore_broadcasts
> +}

Both tests fail for me:
TEST: ping                                              [FAIL]
TEST: ping                                              [FAIL]

Why the need for the iptables rule?

And, PAUSE_ON_FAIL is not working to take a look at why tests are
failing. e.g.,

PAUSE_ON_FAIL=yes ./router_broadcast.sh

just continues on. Might be something with the infrastructure scripts.