[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3c1622e7-8b8e-5dbe-47d9-a28ad14b2942@solarflare.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2018 16:14:44 +0100
From: Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com>
To: <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v4 net-next 9/9] net: don't bother calling list RX functions
on empty lists
Generally the check should be very cheap, as the sk_buff_head is in cache.
Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com>
---
net/core/dev.c | 8 ++++++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 4c5ebfab9bc8..d6084b0cd9ce 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -4773,7 +4773,8 @@ static void __netif_receive_skb_list(struct list_head *head)
/* Handle the previous sublist */
list_cut_before(&sublist, head, &skb->list);
- __netif_receive_skb_list_core(&sublist, pfmemalloc);
+ if (!list_empty(&sublist))
+ __netif_receive_skb_list_core(&sublist, pfmemalloc);
pfmemalloc = !pfmemalloc;
/* See comments in __netif_receive_skb */
if (pfmemalloc)
@@ -4783,7 +4784,8 @@ static void __netif_receive_skb_list(struct list_head *head)
}
}
/* Handle the remaining sublist */
- __netif_receive_skb_list_core(head, pfmemalloc);
+ if (!list_empty(head))
+ __netif_receive_skb_list_core(head, pfmemalloc);
/* Restore pflags */
if (pfmemalloc)
memalloc_noreclaim_restore(noreclaim_flag);
@@ -4944,6 +4946,8 @@ void netif_receive_skb_list(struct list_head *head)
{
struct sk_buff *skb;
+ if (list_empty(head))
+ return;
list_for_each_entry(skb, head, list)
trace_netif_receive_skb_list_entry(skb);
netif_receive_skb_list_internal(head);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists