[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5ef0b797-67ff-e84a-367d-bd3da96a13b3@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2018 15:06:46 +0800
From: "lipeng (Y)" <lipeng321@...wei.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linuxarm@...wei.com>, <yisen.zhuang@...wei.com>,
<salil.mehta@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 05/10] net: hns3: using modulo for cyclic
counters in hclge_cmd_send
On 2018/6/30 20:03, David Miller wrote:
> From: Peng Li <lipeng321@...wei.com>
> Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2018 19:23:00 +0800
>
>> @@ -228,8 +228,7 @@ int hclge_cmd_send(struct hclge_hw *hw, struct hclge_desc *desc, int num)
>> desc_to_use = &hw->cmq.csq.desc[hw->cmq.csq.next_to_use];
>> *desc_to_use = desc[handle];
>> (hw->cmq.csq.next_to_use)++;
>> - if (hw->cmq.csq.next_to_use == hw->cmq.csq.desc_num)
>> - hw->cmq.csq.next_to_use = 0;
>> + hw->cmq.csq.next_to_use %= hw->cmq.csq.desc_num;
>> handle++;
> I would advise against this.
>
> The "%" modulus operation takes many cpu cycles, and the current code
> is thus much faster.
>
> .
Agree with you.
Thanks for your review, we concentrate on the code style and ignore the
performance in this patch, It is not good.
I will remove this patch from the patchset.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists