[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e8a9e121-9b5d-2e45-2547-148a782e6751@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2018 09:44:51 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Realtek linux nic maintainers <nic_swsd@...ltek.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 02/10] r8169: use phy_resume/phy_suspend
On 07/02/2018 02:24 PM, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> On 02.07.2018 23:06, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>>> static void r8168_pll_power_down(struct rtl8169_private *tp)
>>> {
>>> if (r8168_check_dash(tp))
>>> @@ -4510,7 +4469,8 @@ static void r8168_pll_power_down(struct rtl8169_private *tp)
>>> if (rtl_wol_pll_power_down(tp))
>>> return;
>>>
>>> - r8168_phy_power_down(tp);
>>> + /* cover the case that PHY isn't connected */
>>> + phy_suspend(mdiobus_get_phy(tp->mii_bus, 0));
>>
>> This could do some more explanation. Why would it not be connected?
>>
> The PHY gets connected when the net_device is opened. If a network
> port isn't used then it will be runtime-suspended a few seconds after
> boot. In this case we call r8168_pll_power_down() with the PHY not
> being connected.
Would not the !netif_running() check in rtl8169_net_suspend() take care
of that though?
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists