netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/3] bpf: btf: add btf print functionality

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 3 Jul 2018 16:33:50 -0700
From:   Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
CC:     Okash Khawaja <osk@...com>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        "Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@...nel.org>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@...ronome.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <kernel-team@...com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/3] bpf: btf: add btf print functionality

On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 03:38:43PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Jul 2018 15:23:31 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > > > > +			else
> > > > > +				jsonw_printf(jw, "%hhd", *((char *)data));    
> > > > 
> > > > ... I think you need to always print a string, and express it as
> > > > \u00%02hhx for non-printable.    
> > > Okay that makes sense  
> > 
> > Yeah, IDK, char can be used as a byte as well as a string.  In eBPF
> > it may actually be more likely to just be used as a raw byte buffer...
> 
> Actually, what is the definition/purpose of BTF_INT_CHAR?  There seems
> to be no BTF_INT_SHORT and BTF_INT_SIGNED can simply be of size 8...
> Is normal int only used for bitfields of size 8 and BTF_INT_CHAR for
> char variables?
> 
> The kernel seems to be rejecting combinations of those flags, is
> unsigned char going to not be marked as char then?
BTF_INT_ENOCODING (CHAR/SIGNED/BOOL) is for formatting (e.g. pretty
print).  It is mainly how CTF is using it also.  Hence, BTF_INT_ENCODINGs
is not a 1:1 mapping to C integer types.
The size of an interger is described by BTF_INT_BITS instead.  

> 
> > Either way I think it may be nice to keep it consistent, at least for
> > the JSON output could we do either always ints or always characters?
>