lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180705150556.9055.86398.stgit@john-Precision-Tower-5810>
Date:   Thu, 05 Jul 2018 08:05:56 -0700
From:   John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
To:     ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, john.fastabend@...il.com
Subject: [bpf PATCH v2 1/2] bpf: sockmap,
 error path can not release psock in multi-map case

The current code, in the error path of sock_hash_ctx_update_elem,
checks if the sock has a psock in the user data and if so decrements
the reference count of the psock. However, if the error happens early
in the error path we may have never incremented the psock reference
count and if the psock exists because the sock is in another map then
we may inadvertently decrement the reference count.

Fix this by making the error path only call smap_release_sock if the
error happens after the increment.

Reported-by: syzbot+d464d2c20c717ef5a6a8@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: 81110384441a ("bpf: sockmap, add hash map support")
Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/sockmap.c |   17 ++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/sockmap.c b/kernel/bpf/sockmap.c
index cf7b6a6..3847a7c 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/sockmap.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/sockmap.c
@@ -1896,7 +1896,7 @@ static int __sock_map_ctx_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map,
 		e = kzalloc(sizeof(*e), GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN);
 		if (!e) {
 			err = -ENOMEM;
-			goto out_progs;
+			goto out_free;
 		}
 	}
 
@@ -2342,7 +2342,10 @@ static int sock_hash_ctx_update_elem(struct bpf_sock_ops_kern *skops,
 	if (err)
 		goto err;
 
-	/* bpf_map_update_elem() can be called in_irq() */
+	/* psock is valid here because otherwise above *ctx_update_elem would
+	 * have thrown an error. It is safe to skip error check.
+	 */
+	psock = smap_psock_sk(sock);
 	raw_spin_lock_bh(&b->lock);
 	l_old = lookup_elem_raw(head, hash, key, key_size);
 	if (l_old && map_flags == BPF_NOEXIST) {
@@ -2360,12 +2363,6 @@ static int sock_hash_ctx_update_elem(struct bpf_sock_ops_kern *skops,
 		goto bucket_err;
 	}
 
-	psock = smap_psock_sk(sock);
-	if (unlikely(!psock)) {
-		err = -EINVAL;
-		goto bucket_err;
-	}
-
 	rcu_assign_pointer(e->hash_link, l_new);
 	rcu_assign_pointer(e->htab,
 			   container_of(map, struct bpf_htab, map));
@@ -2388,12 +2385,10 @@ static int sock_hash_ctx_update_elem(struct bpf_sock_ops_kern *skops,
 	raw_spin_unlock_bh(&b->lock);
 	return 0;
 bucket_err:
+	smap_release_sock(psock, sock);
 	raw_spin_unlock_bh(&b->lock);
 err:
 	kfree(e);
-	psock = smap_psock_sk(sock);
-	if (psock)
-		smap_release_sock(psock, sock);
 	return err;
 }
 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ