lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1530900606-24429-3-git-send-email-jon.maloy@ericsson.com>
Date:   Fri, 6 Jul 2018 20:10:04 +0200
From:   Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@...csson.com>
To:     <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     <gordan.mihaljevic@...tech.com.au>, <tung.q.nguyen@...tech.com.au>,
        <hoang.h.le@...tech.com.au>, <jon.maloy@...csson.com>,
        <canh.d.luu@...tech.com.au>, <ying.xue@...driver.com>,
        <tipc-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: [net 2/4] tipc: correct discovery message handling during address trial period

With the duplicate address discovery protocol for tipc nodes addresses
we introduced a one second trial period before a node is allocated a
hash number to use as address.

Unfortunately, we miss to handle the case when a regular LINK REQUEST/
RESPONSE arrives from a cluster node during the trial period. Such
messages are not ignored as they should be, leading to links setup
attempts while the node still has no address.

Fixes: 25b0b9c4e835 ("tipc: handle collisions of 32-bit node address hash values")
Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@...csson.com>
---
 net/tipc/discover.c | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/tipc/discover.c b/net/tipc/discover.c
index 9f666e0..dcadc10 100644
--- a/net/tipc/discover.c
+++ b/net/tipc/discover.c
@@ -133,6 +133,8 @@ static void disc_dupl_alert(struct tipc_bearer *b, u32 node_addr,
 }
 
 /* tipc_disc_addr_trial(): - handle an address uniqueness trial from peer
+ * Returns true if message should be dropped by caller, i.e., if it is a
+ * trial message or we are inside trial period. Otherwise false.
  */
 static bool tipc_disc_addr_trial_msg(struct tipc_discoverer *d,
 				     struct tipc_media_addr *maddr,
@@ -168,8 +170,9 @@ static bool tipc_disc_addr_trial_msg(struct tipc_discoverer *d,
 		msg_set_type(buf_msg(d->skb), DSC_REQ_MSG);
 	}
 
+	/* Accept regular link requests/responses only after trial period */
 	if (mtyp != DSC_TRIAL_MSG)
-		return false;
+		return trial;
 
 	sugg_addr = tipc_node_try_addr(net, peer_id, src);
 	if (sugg_addr)
-- 
2.1.4

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ