[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <af52b285-e97b-f610-acc6-cb1361609034@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2018 03:24:13 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@...gle.com>,
Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan <subashab@...eaurora.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Alistair Strachan <astrachan@...gle.com>,
David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: Crash due to destroying TCP request sockets using SOCK_DESTROY
On 07/05/2018 09:46 PM, Lorenzo Colitti wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 11:37 AM Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan
> <subashab@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>>
>> From the call stack, a TCP socket is being destroyed using netlink_diag.
>> The memory dump showed that the socket was an inet request socket (in
>> state TCP_NEW_SYN_RECV) with refcount of 0.
>> [...]
>> 13232.479820: <2> refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free.
>> 13232.479838: <6> ------------[ cut here ]------------
>> 13232.479843: <6> kernel BUG at kernel/msm-4.14/lib/refcount.c:204!
>> 13232.479849: <6> Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
>> [...]
>> 13232.479996: <6> Process netd (pid: 648, stack limit =
>> 0xffffff801cf98000)
>> 13232.479998: <2> Call trace:
>> 13232.480000: <2> refcount_sub_and_test+0x64/0x78
>> 13232.480002: <2> refcount_dec_and_test+0x18/0x24
>> 13232.480005: <2> sock_gen_put+0x1c/0xb0
>> 13232.480009: <2> tcp_diag_destroy+0x54/0x68
>> [...]
>
> Looks like for a TCP_NEW_SYN_RECV socket, sock_diag_destroy
> essentially ends up doing:
>
> struct request_sock *req = inet_reqsk(sk);
>
> local_bh_disable();
> inet_csk_reqsk_queue_drop_and_put(req->rsk_listener,
> req);
> local_bh_enable();
> ...
>
> sock_gen_put(sk);
>
> It looks like inet_csk_reqsk_queue_drop_and_put calls reqsk_put(req),
> which frees the socket, and at that point sock_gen_put is a UAF. Do we
> just need:
>
> - inet_csk_reqsk_queue_drop_and_put(req->rsk_listener,
> - req);
> + inet_csk_reqsk_queue_drop(req->rsk_listener, req);
>
> since sock_gen_put will also end up calling reqsk_put() for a
> TCP_SYN_RECV socket?
>
> Alastair - you're able to reproduce this UAF using net_test on qemu,
> right? If so, could you try that two-line patch above?
>
Hi Lorenzo
Your patch makes sense to me, please submit it formally with :
Fixes: d7226c7a4dd1 ("net: diag: Fix refcnt leak in error path destroying socket")
Cc: David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>
Thanks !
Powered by blists - more mailing lists