[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AM5PR0701MB265751E3A716081292C5224FE4450@AM5PR0701MB2657.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2018 09:57:22 +0000
From: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@...mail.de>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] Add a missing break in parse_station_flags
I was looking at usually suppressed gcc warnings,
[-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] in this case:
The code definitely looks like a break is missing here.
However I am not able to test the NL80211_IFTYPE_MESH_POINT,
nor do I actually know what might be :)
So please use this patch with caution and only if you are
able to do some testing.
Signed-off-by: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@...mail.de>
---
net/wireless/nl80211.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/net/wireless/nl80211.c b/net/wireless/nl80211.c
index 4eece06..6537b5d 100644
--- a/net/wireless/nl80211.c
+++ b/net/wireless/nl80211.c
@@ -4409,6 +4409,7 @@ static int parse_station_flags(struct genl_info *info,
params->sta_flags_mask = BIT(NL80211_STA_FLAG_AUTHENTICATED) |
BIT(NL80211_STA_FLAG_MFP) |
BIT(NL80211_STA_FLAG_AUTHORIZED);
+ break;
default:
return -EINVAL;
}
--
1.9.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists