[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180711113603.16589-1-vincent@bernat.im>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 13:36:03 +0200
From: Vincent Bernat <vincent@...nat.im>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org, stephen@...workplumber.org,
serhe.popovych@...il.com
Cc: Vincent Bernat <vincent@...nat.im>
Subject: [PATCH iproute2-next] ipaddress: fix label matching
Since 9516823051ce, "ip addr show label lo:1" doesn't work
anymore (doesn't show any address, despite a matching label).
Reverting to return 0 instead of -1 fix the issue.
However, the condition says: "if we filter by label [...] and the
label does NOT match the interface name". This makes little sense to
compare the label with the interface name. There is also a logic
around filter family being provided or not. The match against the
label is done by ifa_label_match_rta() in print_addrinfo() and
ipaddr_filter().
Just removing the condition makes "ip addr show" works as expected
with or without specifying a label, both when the label is matching
and not matching. It also works if we specify a label and the label is
the interface name. The flush operation also works as expected.
Fixes: 9516823051ce ("ipaddress: Improve print_linkinfo()")
Signed-off-by: Vincent Bernat <vincent@...nat.im>
---
ip/ipaddress.c | 5 -----
1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ip/ipaddress.c b/ip/ipaddress.c
index 5009bfe6d2e3..20ef6724944e 100644
--- a/ip/ipaddress.c
+++ b/ip/ipaddress.c
@@ -837,11 +837,6 @@ int print_linkinfo(const struct sockaddr_nl *who,
if (!name)
return -1;
- if (filter.label &&
- (!filter.family || filter.family == AF_PACKET) &&
- fnmatch(filter.label, name, 0))
- return -1;
-
if (tb[IFLA_GROUP]) {
int group = rta_getattr_u32(tb[IFLA_GROUP]);
--
2.18.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists