[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1dbb2b2867e7e46018a1bf4a9aa1fd81eb9fe535.1531315217.git.daniel@iogearbox.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 15:30:14 +0200
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: ast@...com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Subject: [PATCH bpf] bpf: fix panic due to oob in bpf_prog_test_run_skb
sykzaller triggered several panics similar to the below:
[...]
[ 248.851531] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in _copy_to_user+0x5c/0x90
[ 248.857656] Read of size 985 at addr ffff8808017ffff2 by task a.out/1425
[...]
[ 248.865902] CPU: 1 PID: 1425 Comm: a.out Not tainted 4.18.0-rc4+ #13
[ 248.865903] Hardware name: Supermicro SYS-5039MS-H12TRF/X11SSE-F, BIOS 2.1a 03/08/2018
[ 248.865905] Call Trace:
[ 248.865910] dump_stack+0xd6/0x185
[ 248.865911] ? show_regs_print_info+0xb/0xb
[ 248.865913] ? printk+0x9c/0xc3
[ 248.865915] ? kmsg_dump_rewind_nolock+0xe4/0xe4
[ 248.865919] print_address_description+0x6f/0x270
[ 248.865920] kasan_report+0x25b/0x380
[ 248.865922] ? _copy_to_user+0x5c/0x90
[ 248.865924] check_memory_region+0x137/0x190
[ 248.865925] kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20
[ 248.865927] _copy_to_user+0x5c/0x90
[ 248.865930] bpf_test_finish.isra.8+0x4f/0xc0
[ 248.865932] bpf_prog_test_run_skb+0x6a0/0xba0
[...]
After scrubbing the BPF prog a bit from the noise, turns out it called
bpf_skb_change_head() for the lwt_xmit prog with headroom of 2. Nothing
wrong in that, however, this was run with repeat >> 0 in bpf_prog_test_run_skb()
and the same skb thus keeps changing until the pskb_expand_head() called
from skb_cow() keeps bailing out in atomic alloc context with -ENOMEM.
So upon return we'll basically have 0 headroom left yet blindly do the
__skb_push() of 14 bytes and keep copying data from there in bpf_test_finish()
out of bounds. Fix to check if we have enough headroom and if pskb_expand_head()
fails, bail out with error.
Another bug independent of this fix (but related in triggering above) is
that BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN should be reworked to reset the skb/xdp buffer to
it's original state from input as otherwise repeating the same test in a
loop won't work for benchmarking when underlying input buffer is getting
changed by the prog each time and reused for the next run leading to
unexpected results.
Fixes: 1cf1cae963c2 ("bpf: introduce BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command")
Reported-by: syzbot+709412e651e55ed96498@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+54f39d6ab58f39720a55@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
---
net/bpf/test_run.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/bpf/test_run.c b/net/bpf/test_run.c
index 68c3578..22a78ee 100644
--- a/net/bpf/test_run.c
+++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c
@@ -96,6 +96,7 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_skb(struct bpf_prog *prog, const union bpf_attr *kattr,
u32 size = kattr->test.data_size_in;
u32 repeat = kattr->test.repeat;
u32 retval, duration;
+ int hh_len = ETH_HLEN;
struct sk_buff *skb;
void *data;
int ret;
@@ -131,12 +132,22 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_skb(struct bpf_prog *prog, const union bpf_attr *kattr,
skb_reset_network_header(skb);
if (is_l2)
- __skb_push(skb, ETH_HLEN);
+ __skb_push(skb, hh_len);
if (is_direct_pkt_access)
bpf_compute_data_pointers(skb);
retval = bpf_test_run(prog, skb, repeat, &duration);
- if (!is_l2)
- __skb_push(skb, ETH_HLEN);
+ if (!is_l2) {
+ if (skb_headroom(skb) < hh_len) {
+ int nhead = HH_DATA_ALIGN(hh_len - skb_headroom(skb));
+
+ if (pskb_expand_head(skb, nhead, 0, GFP_USER)) {
+ kfree_skb(skb);
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+ }
+ memset(__skb_push(skb, hh_len), 0, hh_len);
+ }
+
size = skb->len;
/* bpf program can never convert linear skb to non-linear */
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(skb_is_nonlinear(skb)))
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
index 2ecd27b..f5f7bcc 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
@@ -4975,6 +4975,24 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_XMIT,
},
{
+ "make headroom for LWT_XMIT",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 34),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0),
+ BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_skb_change_head),
+ /* split for s390 to succeed */
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 42),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0),
+ BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_skb_change_head),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_XMIT,
+ },
+ {
"invalid access of tc_classid for LWT_IN",
.insns = {
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
@@ -12554,8 +12572,11 @@ static void do_test_single(struct bpf_test *test, bool unpriv,
}
if (fd_prog >= 0) {
+ __u8 tmp[TEST_DATA_LEN << 2];
+ __u32 size_tmp = sizeof(tmp);
+
err = bpf_prog_test_run(fd_prog, 1, test->data,
- sizeof(test->data), NULL, NULL,
+ sizeof(test->data), tmp, &size_tmp,
&retval, NULL);
if (err && errno != 524/*ENOTSUPP*/ && errno != EPERM) {
printf("Unexpected bpf_prog_test_run error\n");
--
2.9.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists