netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 5/5 v3] net: gemini: Indicate that we can handle jumboframes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 11 Jul 2018 21:57:01 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Hans Ulli Kroll <ulli.kroll@...glemail.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 5/5 v3] net: gemini: Indicate that we can handle
 jumboframes

On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 09:32:45PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> The hardware supposedly handles frames up to 10236 bytes and
> implements .ndo_change_mtu() so accept 10236 minus the ethernet
> header for a VLAN tagged frame on the netdevices. Use
> ETH_MIN_MTU as minimum MTU.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>

Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>

    Andrew