[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2AD939572F25A448A3AE3CAEA61328C23784EDEB@BC-MAIL-M28.internal.baidu.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 03:03:51 +0000
From: "Li,Rongqing" <lirongqing@...du.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: 答复: [PATCH] net: convert gro_count to bitmask
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: David Miller [mailto:davem@...emloft.net]
> 发送时间: 2018年7月12日 10:49
> 收件人: Li,Rongqing <lirongqing@...du.com>
> 抄送: netdev@...r.kernel.org
> 主题: Re: [PATCH] net: convert gro_count to bitmask
>
> From: Li RongQing <lirongqing@...du.com>
> Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 17:15:53 +0800
>
> > + clear_bit(index, &napi->gro_bitmask);
>
> Please don't use atomics here, at least use __clear_bit().
>
Thanks, this is same as Eric's suggestion.
> This is why I did the operations by hand in my version of the patch.
> Also, if you are going to preempt my patch, at least retain the comment I
> added around the GRO_HASH_BUCKETS definitions which warns the reader
> about the limit.
>
I add BUILD_BUG_ON in netdev_init, so I think we need not to add comment
@@ -9151,6 +9159,9 @@ static struct hlist_head * __net_init netdev_create_hash(void)
/* Initialize per network namespace state */ static int __net_init netdev_init(struct net *net) {
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(GRO_HASH_BUCKETS >
+ FIELD_SIZEOF(struct napi_struct, gro_bitmask));
+
-RongQing
> Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists