[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3f635da3-45ac-da42-1db1-485fb1d5ecd4@infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2018 09:48:41 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson <jidanni@...anni.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] TCP: make seq # error messages more readable
On 07/13/2018 06:38 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
>
> On 07/12/2018 05:48 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
>>
>> Attempt to make cryptic TCP seq number error messages clearer by
>> (1) adding the function name, (2) identifying the errors as "seq # bug",
>> and (3) grouping the field identifiers and values by separating them
>> with commas.
>>
>> E.g., the following message is changed from:
>>
>> recvmsg bug 2: copied 73BCB6CD seq 70F17CBE rcvnxt 73BCB9AA fl 0
>> WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 1501 at /linux/net/ipv4/tcp.c:1881 tcp_recvmsg+0x649/0xb90
>>
>> to:
>>
>> tcp_recvmsg: TCP recvmsg seq # bug 2: copied 73BCB6CD, seq 70F17CBE, rcvnxt 73BCB9AA, fl 0
>> WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 1501 at /linux/net/ipv4/tcp.c:2011 tcp_recvmsg+0x694/0xba0
>>
>
> Hi Randy
>
> It is not clear what this patch improves.
> Do we really to mention tcp twice ?
I will gladly drop the __func__: string. Doing so would change this:
recvmsg bug 2: copied 73BCB6CD seq 70F17CBE rcvnxt 73BCB9AA fl 0
to:
TCP recvmsg seq # bug 2: copied 73BCB6CD, seq 70F17CBE, rcvnxt 73BCB9AA, fl 0
The (new) message identifies that it is TCP and that it is a sequence # bug.
Both of those are helpful in my view, whereas the original message isn't
helpful at all.
>
> Thanks.
--
~Randy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists