netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 02/17] y2038: Remove newstat family from default syscall set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180717125039.GB25416@infradead.org>
Date:   Tue, 17 Jul 2018 05:50:39 -0700
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     tglx@...utronix.de, y2038@...ts.linaro.org, hch@...radead.org,
        linux-api@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
        libc-alpha@...rceware.org, albert.aribaud@...ev.fr,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
        peterz@...radead.org, dvhart@...radead.org, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
        linux@...inikbrodowski.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/17] y2038: Remove newstat family from default
 syscall set

On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 06:10:48PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> We have four generations of stat() syscalls:
> - the oldstat syscalls that are only used on the older architectures
> - the newstat family that is used on all 64-bit architectures but
>   lacked support for large files on 32-bit architectures.
> - the stat64 family that is used mostly on 32-bit architectures to
>   replace newstat
> - statx() to replace all of the above, adding 64-bit timestamps among
>   other things.
> 
> We already compile stat64 only on those architectures that need it,
> but newstat is always built, including on those that don't reference
> it. This adds a new __ARCH_WANT_NEW_STAT symbol along the lines of
> __ARCH_WANT_OLD_STAT and __ARCH_WANT_STAT64 to control compilation of
> newstat. All architectures that need it use an explict define, the
> others now get a little bit smaller, and future architecture (including
> 64-bit targets) won't ever see it.
> 
> Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>

Do I read this right that you only want to provide statx by default?
It is a little different from the traditional stat calls, so I'd like
to know this is actually ok from libc folks first.