[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGHK07DFJE2HFt4NpWR+6PPsiBY1v2tqMzL1tqJ91EXdA9wNbw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 12:57:33 +1000
From: Jonathan Maxwell <jmaxwell37@...il.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>,
David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
kuznet <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
yoshfuji <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jon Maxwell <jmaxwell@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] tcp: improve setsockopt() TCP_USER_TIMEOUT accuracy
Okay I see what you mean looking some examples on:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/
I'll resubmit with the correct patch series numbers but with
the same detailed description.
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 12:40 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 07/17/2018 06:55 PM, Jonathan Maxwell wrote:
>> After committing the patches in my net-next git branch I used git send-mail:
>>
>> git send-email --identity=XXX --cover-letter --annotate origin
>> --compose --signoff
>>
>> and manually updated it based on an example of yours:
>>
>> https://lwn.net/Articles/706491/
>>
>> I can see the 3 patches that I just submitted on:
>>
>> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/
>>
>> Flagged as under review by DaveM.
>>
>
> I dunno, each patch belongs to a separate patch series, this is not expected.
>
> Compare to what happens on https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/ for a proper submission.
>
> If you click on https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/?series=56100 for example,
> you can see 5 patch in a series.
>
> Standard workflow :
>
> git-format-patch ...
>
> <edit cover letter>
>
> git send-email --to "David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>" \
> --cc "netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>" \
> --cc "Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>" \
> 00*
Powered by blists - more mailing lists