[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180719104358.79696-3-jwi@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 12:43:49 +0200
From: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@...ux.ibm.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Stefan Raspl <raspl@...ux.ibm.com>,
Ursula Braun <ubraun@...ux.ibm.com>,
Julian Wiedmann <jwi@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 02/11] s390/qeth: reset layer2 attribute on layer switch
After the subdriver's remove() routine has completed, the card's layer
mode is undetermined again. Reflect this in the layer2 field.
If qeth_dev_layer2_store() hits an error after remove() was called, the
card _always_ requires a setup(), even if the previous layer mode is
requested again.
But qeth_dev_layer2_store() bails out early if the requested layer mode
still matches the current one. So unless we reset the layer2 field,
re-probing the card back to its previous mode is currently not possible.
Signed-off-by: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@...ux.ibm.com>
---
drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_sys.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_sys.c b/drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_sys.c
index c3f18afb368b..cfb659747693 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_sys.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_sys.c
@@ -426,6 +426,7 @@ static ssize_t qeth_dev_layer2_store(struct device *dev,
if (card->discipline) {
card->discipline->remove(card->gdev);
qeth_core_free_discipline(card);
+ card->options.layer2 = -1;
}
rc = qeth_core_load_discipline(card, newdis);
--
2.16.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists