[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cbc20089-6847-c0eb-5b5a-735245986be1@roeck-us.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 20:52:56 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the net-next tree
On 07/18/2018 07:04 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) produced this warning:
>
> *
> * Restart config...
> *
> ....
>
> This is output by my "make allmodconfig" and only started after merging
> the net-next tree today. It has continued for further merges/builds.
>
> I suspect commit
>
> 1323061a018a ("net: phy: sfp: Add HWMON support for module sensors")
>
> which added an "imply" clause.
>
I thought "imply" was better than "depends on HWMON || HWMON=n", but maybe
not. Is that a caveat when using "imply", and does it mean that "imply"
should better not be used ?
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists