lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180719074520.i4wnyas7nipyteyc@gauss3.secunet.de>
Date:   Thu, 19 Jul 2018 09:45:20 +0200
From:   Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To:     Benedict Wong <benedictwong@...gle.com>
CC:     <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <nharold@...gle.com>,
        <lorenzo@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC ipsec-next] xfrm: Remove xfrmi interface ID from flowi

On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 02:40:04PM -0700, Benedict Wong wrote:

> @@ -2301,6 +2322,13 @@ int __xfrm_policy_check(struct sock *sk, int dir, struct sk_buff *skb,
>  	int reverse;
>  	struct flowi fl;
>  	int xerr_idx = -1;
> +	const struct xfrm_if_cb *ifcb;
> +	struct xfrm_if *xi;
> +	u32 if_id = 0;
> +
> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +	ifcb = xfrm_if_get_cb();
> +	rcu_read_unlock();
>  
>  	reverse = dir & ~XFRM_POLICY_MASK;
>  	dir &= XFRM_POLICY_MASK;
> @@ -2325,10 +2353,16 @@ int __xfrm_policy_check(struct sock *sk, int dir, struct sk_buff *skb,
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> +	if (ifcb) {
> +		xi = ifcb->decode_session(skb);
> +		if (xi)
> +			if_id = xi->p.if_id;
> +	}

The usage of the ifcb pointer should go into the
rcu_read_lock section above.

Looks good otherwise, nice improvement.

Please respin and do an official submission of this
patch, I'd like to merge it before I send the pull
request for the ipsec-next tree.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ