netdev - [PATCH] net/9p/trans_fd.c: fix double list

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 20 Jul 2018 15:28:01 +0200
From:   Tomas Bortoli <tomasbortoli@...il.com>
To:     ericvh@...il.com, rminnich@...dia.gov, lucho@...kov.net
Cc:     jiangyiwen@...wei.com, davem@...emloft.net,
        v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, syzkaller@...glegroups.com,
        Tomas Bortoli <tomasbortoli@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] net/9p/trans_fd.c: fix double list_del() and race in access

This patch uses list_del_init() instead of list_del() to eliminate "req_list". This to prevent double list_del()'s calls to the same list from provoking a GPF. Furthermore, this patch fixes an access to "req_list" that was made without getting the relative lock.

Signed-off-by: Tomas Bortoli <tomasbortoli@...il.com>
Reported-by: syzbot+735d926e9d1317c3310c@...kaller.appspotmail.com
---

 net/9p/trans_fd.c | 10 ++++++----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/9p/trans_fd.c b/net/9p/trans_fd.c
index a64b01c56e30..131bb1f059e6 100644
--- a/net/9p/trans_fd.c
+++ b/net/9p/trans_fd.c
@@ -223,7 +223,9 @@ static void p9_conn_cancel(struct p9_conn *m, int err)
 
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(req, rtmp, &cancel_list, req_list) {
 		p9_debug(P9_DEBUG_ERROR, "call back req %p\n", req);
-		list_del(&req->req_list);
+		spin_lock_irqsave(&m->client->lock, flags);
+		list_del_init(&req->req_list);
+		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&m->client->lock, flags);
 		if (!req->t_err)
 			req->t_err = err;
 		p9_client_cb(m->client, req, REQ_STATUS_ERROR);
@@ -369,7 +371,7 @@ static void p9_read_work(struct work_struct *work)
 		spin_lock(&m->client->lock);
 		if (m->req->status != REQ_STATUS_ERROR)
 			status = REQ_STATUS_RCVD;
-		list_del(&m->req->req_list);
+		list_del_init(&m->req->req_list);
 		spin_unlock(&m->client->lock);
 		p9_client_cb(m->client, m->req, status);
 		m->rc.sdata = NULL;
@@ -684,7 +686,7 @@ static int p9_fd_cancel(struct p9_client *client, struct p9_req_t *req)
 	spin_lock(&client->lock);
 
 	if (req->status == REQ_STATUS_UNSENT) {
-		list_del(&req->req_list);
+		list_del_init(&req->req_list);
 		req->status = REQ_STATUS_FLSHD;
 		ret = 0;
 	}
@@ -701,7 +703,7 @@ static int p9_fd_cancelled(struct p9_client *client, struct p9_req_t *req)
 	 * remove it from the list.
 	 */
 	spin_lock(&client->lock);
-	list_del(&req->req_list);
+	list_del_init(&req->req_list);
 	spin_unlock(&client->lock);
 
 	return 0;
-- 
2.11.0