[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180721.232733.468047452825591471.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2018 23:27:33 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, roopa@...ulusnetworks.com,
anuradhak@...ulusnetworks.com, stephen@...workplumber.org,
bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org, wkok@...ulusnetworks.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net: bridge: add support for raw sysfs
port options
From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 17:48:25 +0300
> + spin_lock_bh(&p->br->lock);
> + ret = brport_attr->store_raw(p, (char *)buf);
> + spin_unlock_bh(&p->br->lock);
Please respect the const here.
Have the methods do a kstrncup(); ... kfree(); sequence if they have
to mangle the contents when there is a newline inside.
I know the caller is passing in what was a non-const char pointer,
I've looked at the implementation, but it might be that way forever.
I looked at all other sysfs writes that need to do this \n --> \0
mangling and they either copy the string first into a static buffer
or they do the kstrncup() thing.
Thank you.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists