[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <63FB98FA-9FE8-42F6-82AC-D1D6A21C4F9E@ciena.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 01:43:42 +0000
From: "D'Souza, Nelson" <ndsouza@...na.com>
To: David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [**EXTERNAL**] Re: VRF with enslaved L3 enabled bridge
Hi David,
I copy and pasted the configs onto my device, but pings on test-vrf do not work in my setup.
I'm essentially seeing the same issue as I reported before.
In this case, pings sent out on test-vrf (host ns) are received and replied to by the loopback interface (foo ns). Although the replies are seen at the test-vrf level, they are not locally delivered to the ping application.
Logs are as follows...
a) pings on test-vrf or br0 fail.
# ping -I test-vrf 172.16.2.2 -c1 -w1
PING 172.16.2.2 (172.16.2.2): 56 data bytes
--- 172.16.2.2 ping statistics ---
1 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss
b) tcpdump in the foo namespace, shows icmp echos/replies on veth2
# ip netns exec foo tcpdump -i veth2 icmp -c 2
tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode
listening on veth2, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 262144 bytes
18:34:13.205210 IP 172.16.1.1 > 172.16.2.2: ICMP echo request, id 19513, seq 0, length 64
18:34:13.205253 IP 172.16.2.2 > 172.16.1.1: ICMP echo reply, id 19513, seq 0, length 64
2 packets captured
2 packets received by filter
0 packets dropped by kernel
c) tcpdump in the host namespace, shows icmp echos/replies on test-vrf, br0 and veth1:
# tcpdump -i test-vrf icmp -c 2
tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode
listening on test-vrf, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 262144 bytes
18:34:13.204061 IP 172.16.1.1 > 172.16.2.2: ICMP echo request, id 19513, seq 0, length 64
18:34:13.205278 IP 172.16.2.2 > 172.16.1.1: ICMP echo reply, id 19513, seq 0, length 64
2 packets captured
2 packets received by filter
0 packets dropped by kernel
Thanks,
Nelson
On 7/23/18, 3:00 PM, "David Ahern" <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com> wrote:
On 7/20/18 1:03 PM, D'Souza, Nelson wrote:
> Setup is as follows:
>
> ethUSB(ingress port) -> mgmtbr0 (bridge) -> mgmtvrf (vrf)
| netns foo
[ test-vrf ] |
| |
[ br0 ] 172.16.1.1 |
| |
[ veth1 ] ============|======= [ veth2 ] lo
| 172.16.1.2 172.16.2.2
|
Copy and paste the following into your environment:
ip netns add foo
ip li add veth1 type veth peer name veth2
ip li set veth2 netns foo
ip -netns foo li set lo up
ip -netns foo li set veth2 up
ip -netns foo addr add 172.16.1.2/24 dev veth2
ip li add test-vrf type vrf table 123
ip li set test-vrf up
ip ro add vrf test-vrf unreachable default
ip li add br0 type bridge
ip li set veth1 master br0
ip li set veth1 up
ip li set br0 up
ip addr add dev br0 172.16.1.1/24
ip li set br0 master test-vrf
ip -netns foo addr add 172.16.2.2/32 dev lo
ip ro add vrf test-vrf 172.16.2.2/32 via 172.16.1.2
Does ping work?
# ping -I test-vrf 172.16.2.2
ping: Warning: source address might be selected on device other than
test-vrf.
PING 172.16.2.2 (172.16.2.2) from 172.16.1.1 test-vrf: 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 172.16.2.2: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.228 ms
64 bytes from 172.16.2.2: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.263 ms
and:
# ping -I br0 172.16.2.2
PING 172.16.2.2 (172.16.2.2) from 172.16.1.1 br0: 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 172.16.2.2: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.227 ms
64 bytes from 172.16.2.2: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.223 ms
^C
--- 172.16.2.2 ping statistics ---
2 packets transmitted, 2 received, 0% packet loss, time 1001ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.223/0.225/0.227/0.002 ms
Powered by blists - more mailing lists