netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v3 0/5] TC: refactor act

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180725121734.GE2164@nanopsycho>
Date:   Wed, 25 Jul 2018 14:17:34 +0200
From:   Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To:     Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
        Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>,
        Eyal Birger <eyal.birger@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 0/5] TC: refactor act_mirred packets
 re-injection

Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 02:07:15PM CEST, pabeni@...hat.com wrote:
>Hi,
>
>On Wed, 2018-07-25 at 13:53 +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Could you please send the userspace iproute2 patch and list some
>> examples of usage along with the next patchset version?
>
>There are no iproute2 patches, as TC_ACT_REINJECT is not accessible
>from user-space: act_mirred will use such value when possible.

Okay.

>
>User-space can have any notion of the above only via the perf tool
>and/or performances tests ;)
>
>An use case is the OVS TC S/W datapath. openvswitch alreday leverage
>this when configured with:
>
>other_config:hw-offload=true
>other_config:tc-policy=none
>
>> Also, I would like you to do selftest script to test this and have it as
>> a part of this patchset.
>
>As said, there is no user-space change. AFAICS the current act_mirred
>self tests already cover this. Do you have other things in mind?

Sounds allright. Thanks for the explanation!


>
>Cheers,
>
>Paolo
>