netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v3 4/5] net/tc: introduce TC_ACT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <78388c31-cf16-217c-f73c-0bd211ebc87b@mojatatu.com>
Date:   Wed, 25 Jul 2018 11:26:05 -0400
From:   Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
To:     Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>,
        Eyal Birger <eyal.birger@...il.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 4/5] net/tc: introduce TC_ACT_REINJECT.

On 25/07/18 10:24 AM, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-07-25 at 08:27 -0400, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:

>> Those changes were there from the beginning (above patch did
>> not introduce them).
>> IIRC, the reason was to distinguish between policy intended
>> drops and drops because of errors.
> 
> Double-checking to avoid misinterepration on my side: you are ok with
> keeping the 'overlimits' increment, right?

Yes.

cheers,
jamal