netdev - Re: [PATCH rdma-next v2 0/8] Support mlx5 flow steering with RAW data

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180726145809.GB10168@ziepe.ca>
Date:   Thu, 26 Jul 2018 08:58:09 -0600
From:   Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To:     Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Cc:     Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
        RDMA mailing list <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
        Yishai Hadas <yishaih@...lanox.com>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
        linux-netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next v2 0/8] Support mlx5 flow steering with RAW data

On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 07:35:49AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 08:35:17AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 08:37:03AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> >
> > > > Also, I would like to keep the specs consistently formatted according
> > > > to clang-format with 'BinPackParameters: true', so I reflowed them as
> > > > well.
> > >
> > > I'm using default VIM clang-format.py without anything in .clang-format.
> > > Do you have an extra definitions there, except BinPackParameters?
> >
> > These days Linux includes a top level .clang-format that does a
> > pretty good job.
> >
> > I have to manually switch BinPackParameters on when working with these
> > specs to get the right indenting.. A pain, but maybe there is a better
> > way someday..
> 
> I don't think that it is feasible to ask from people to change some
> defaults only for patches that touch those specs. Any change in this
> area will change formatting back.

Eventually I think we might be able toadd a code comment to tell
clang-format, but that would be down the road a bit..

> Jason, bottom line, I won't use BinPackParameters for my patches.

Well, you can make sure the specs macro follows the required
formatting code style by hand if you prefer..

But, I want to see them in this layout, so they are easier to
maintain, not the haphazard layout we had before.

Jason