netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v4 1/4] net/sched: user-space can't set unknown tcfa

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1c1fe6c84a0bbba7d0db885b1eb2d1e7734c927b.camel@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri, 27 Jul 2018 15:08:06 +0200
From:   Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To:     Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
        Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Eyal Birger <eyal.birger@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 1/4] net/sched: user-space can't set unknown
 tcfa_action values

On Thu, 2018-07-26 at 21:28 -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 04:34:57PM +0200, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> ...
> > @@ -895,6 +904,14 @@ struct tc_action *tcf_action_init_1(struct net *net, struct tcf_proto *tp,
> >  		}
> >  	}
> >  
> > +	if (!tcf_action_valid(a->tcfa_action)) {
> > +		net_warn_ratelimited("invalid %d action value, using "
> > +				     "TC_ACT_UNSPEC instead", a->tcfa_action);
> 
> Now that it is reporting the error via extack, do we really need this
> warn net_warn?
> extack will be shown as a warning by iproute2 even if the command
> succeeds.

That was requested by Jiri (modulo misinterpretation on my side).
My understanding is that the extact will warn the whoever tryed to push
the bad configuration, while the net_warn is targeting the hosts
administrator.

Jiri, do you have strong opinion on this or did I misinterpret your
wording/ can I drop the net_warn?

Thanks!

> > +		NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "invalid action value, using "
> > +			       "TC_ACT_UNSPEC instead");
> 
> Quoted strings shouldn't be broken down into multiple lines..

Thanks, 

will fix in v5 :(

Cheers,

Paolo