netdev - Re: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 01/14] bpf: add ability to charge bpf maps memory dynamically

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 27 Jul 2018 20:01:05 +0200
From:   Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To:     Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 01/14] bpf: add ability to charge bpf maps
 memory dynamically

On 07/20/2018 07:45 PM, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> This commits extends existing bpf maps memory charging API
> to support dynamic charging/uncharging.
> 
> This is required to account memory used by maps,
> if all entries are created dynamically after
> the map initialization.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
> ---
>  include/linux/bpf.h  |  2 ++
>  kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>  2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
> index 5b5ad95cf339..5a4a256473c3 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bpf.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
> @@ -435,6 +435,8 @@ struct bpf_map * __must_check bpf_map_inc(struct bpf_map *map, bool uref);
>  void bpf_map_put_with_uref(struct bpf_map *map);
>  void bpf_map_put(struct bpf_map *map);
>  int bpf_map_precharge_memlock(u32 pages);
> +int bpf_map_charge_memlock(struct bpf_map *map, u32 pages);
> +void bpf_map_uncharge_memlock(struct bpf_map *map, u32 pages);
>  void *bpf_map_area_alloc(size_t size, int numa_node);
>  void bpf_map_area_free(void *base);
>  void bpf_map_init_from_attr(struct bpf_map *map, union bpf_attr *attr);
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> index d10ecd78105f..cee452a19538 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> @@ -181,32 +181,55 @@ int bpf_map_precharge_memlock(u32 pages)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static int bpf_map_charge_memlock(struct bpf_map *map)
> +static int bpf_charge_memlock(struct user_struct *user, u32 pages)
>  {
> -	struct user_struct *user = get_current_user();
> -	unsigned long memlock_limit;
> +	unsigned long memlock_limit = rlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>  
> -	memlock_limit = rlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> +	if (atomic_long_add_return(pages, &user->locked_vm) > memlock_limit) {
> +		atomic_long_sub(pages, &user->locked_vm);
> +		return -EPERM;
> +	}
> +	return 0;
> +}
>  
> -	atomic_long_add(map->pages, &user->locked_vm);
> +static int bpf_map_init_memlock(struct bpf_map *map)
> +{
> +	struct user_struct *user = get_current_user();
> +	int ret;
>  
> -	if (atomic_long_read(&user->locked_vm) > memlock_limit) {
> -		atomic_long_sub(map->pages, &user->locked_vm);
> +	ret = bpf_charge_memlock(user, map->pages);
> +	if (ret) {
>  		free_uid(user);
> -		return -EPERM;
> +		return ret;
>  	}
>  	map->user = user;
> -	return 0;
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  
> -static void bpf_map_uncharge_memlock(struct bpf_map *map)
> +static void bpf_map_release_memlock(struct bpf_map *map)
>  {
>  	struct user_struct *user = map->user;
> -
> -	atomic_long_sub(map->pages, &user->locked_vm);
> +	atomic_long_sub(map->pages, &map->user->locked_vm);

Just a small nit since you're respinning anyway, could you also make a
proper destructor for the bpf_charge_memlock(), so we have a bpf_uncharge_memlock()
which this one here would be calling as well as ...

>  	free_uid(user);
>  }
>  
> +int bpf_map_charge_memlock(struct bpf_map *map, u32 pages)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = bpf_charge_memlock(map->user, pages);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +	map->pages += pages;
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +void bpf_map_uncharge_memlock(struct bpf_map *map, u32 pages)
> +{
> +	atomic_long_sub(pages, &map->user->locked_vm);

... this one, so we hide the details there.

> +	map->pages -= pages;
> +}
> +
>  static int bpf_map_alloc_id(struct bpf_map *map)
>  {
>  	int id;
> @@ -256,7 +279,7 @@ static void bpf_map_free_deferred(struct work_struct *work)
>  {
>  	struct bpf_map *map = container_of(work, struct bpf_map, work);
>  
> -	bpf_map_uncharge_memlock(map);
> +	bpf_map_release_memlock(map);
>  	security_bpf_map_free(map);
>  	/* implementation dependent freeing */
>  	map->ops->map_free(map);
> @@ -492,7 +515,7 @@ static int map_create(union bpf_attr *attr)
>  	if (err)
>  		goto free_map_nouncharge;
>  
> -	err = bpf_map_charge_memlock(map);
> +	err = bpf_map_init_memlock(map);
>  	if (err)
>  		goto free_map_sec;
>  
> @@ -515,7 +538,7 @@ static int map_create(union bpf_attr *attr)
>  	return err;
>  
>  free_map:
> -	bpf_map_uncharge_memlock(map);
> +	bpf_map_release_memlock(map);
>  free_map_sec:
>  	security_bpf_map_free(map);
>  free_map_nouncharge:
>