netdev - Re: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 04/14] bpf: allocate cgroup storage entries on attaching bpf programs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <60f1e04e-eff9-543f-9f0e-b0cd50bbe71e@iogearbox.net>
Date:   Fri, 27 Jul 2018 06:21:38 +0200
From:   Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To:     Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 04/14] bpf: allocate cgroup storage entries on
 attaching bpf programs

On 07/20/2018 07:45 PM, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> If a bpf program is using cgroup local storage, allocate
> a bpf_cgroup_storage structure automatically on attaching the program
> to a cgroup and save the pointer into the corresponding bpf_prog_list
> entry.
> Analogically, release the cgroup local storage on detaching
> of the bpf program.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
> ---
>  include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h |  1 +
>  kernel/bpf/cgroup.c        | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h b/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h
> index 1b1b4e94d77d..f37347331fdb 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h
> @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ struct bpf_cgroup_storage {
>  struct bpf_prog_list {
>  	struct list_head node;
>  	struct bpf_prog *prog;
> +	struct bpf_cgroup_storage *storage;
>  };
>  
>  struct bpf_prog_array;
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c b/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
> index badabb0b435c..986ff18ef92e 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/cgroup.c
> @@ -34,6 +34,8 @@ void cgroup_bpf_put(struct cgroup *cgrp)
>  		list_for_each_entry_safe(pl, tmp, progs, node) {
>  			list_del(&pl->node);
>  			bpf_prog_put(pl->prog);
> +			bpf_cgroup_storage_unlink(pl->storage);
> +			bpf_cgroup_storage_free(pl->storage);
>  			kfree(pl);
>  			static_branch_dec(&cgroup_bpf_enabled_key);
>  		}
> @@ -188,6 +190,7 @@ int __cgroup_bpf_attach(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct bpf_prog *prog,
>  {
>  	struct list_head *progs = &cgrp->bpf.progs[type];
>  	struct bpf_prog *old_prog = NULL;
> +	struct bpf_cgroup_storage *storage, *old_storage = NULL;
>  	struct cgroup_subsys_state *css;
>  	struct bpf_prog_list *pl;
>  	bool pl_was_allocated;
> @@ -210,6 +213,10 @@ int __cgroup_bpf_attach(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct bpf_prog *prog,
>  	if (prog_list_length(progs) >= BPF_CGROUP_MAX_PROGS)
>  		return -E2BIG;
>  
> +	storage = bpf_cgroup_storage_alloc(prog);
> +	if (IS_ERR(storage))
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
>  	if (flags & BPF_F_ALLOW_MULTI) {
>  		list_for_each_entry(pl, progs, node)
>  			if (pl->prog == prog)
> @@ -217,24 +224,33 @@ int __cgroup_bpf_attach(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct bpf_prog *prog,
>  				return -EINVAL;
>  
>  		pl = kmalloc(sizeof(*pl), GFP_KERNEL);
> -		if (!pl)
> +		if (!pl) {
> +			bpf_cgroup_storage_free(storage);
>  			return -ENOMEM;
> +		}

Above code is:

        storage = bpf_cgroup_storage_alloc(prog);
        if (IS_ERR(storage))
                return -ENOMEM;

        if (flags & BPF_F_ALLOW_MULTI) {
                list_for_each_entry(pl, progs, node)
                        if (pl->prog == prog)
                                /* disallow attaching the same prog twice */
                                return -EINVAL;

                pl = kmalloc(sizeof(*pl), GFP_KERNEL);
                if (!pl) {
                        bpf_cgroup_storage_free(storage);
                        return -ENOMEM;
                }

Given bpf_cgroup_storage_alloc() only changes the mem and prepares (kmallocs)
the local storage buffer, we would leak it above where we attach the same
prog twice, no?

> +
>  		pl_was_allocated = true;
>  		pl->prog = prog;
> +		pl->storage = storage;
>  		list_add_tail(&pl->node, progs);
>  	} else {
>  		if (list_empty(progs)) {
>  			pl = kmalloc(sizeof(*pl), GFP_KERNEL);
> -			if (!pl)
> +			if (!pl) {
> +				bpf_cgroup_storage_free(storage);
>  				return -ENOMEM;
> +			}
>  			pl_was_allocated = true;
>  			list_add_tail(&pl->node, progs);
>  		} else {
>  			pl = list_first_entry(progs, typeof(*pl), node);
>  			old_prog = pl->prog;
> +			old_storage = pl->storage;
> +			bpf_cgroup_storage_unlink(old_storage);
>  			pl_was_allocated = false;
>  		}
>  		pl->prog = prog;
> +		pl->storage = storage;
>  	}
>  
>  	cgrp->bpf.flags[type] = flags;
> @@ -257,10 +273,13 @@ int __cgroup_bpf_attach(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct bpf_prog *prog,
>  	}
>  
>  	static_branch_inc(&cgroup_bpf_enabled_key);
> +	if (old_storage)
> +		bpf_cgroup_storage_free(old_storage);
>  	if (old_prog) {
>  		bpf_prog_put(old_prog);
>  		static_branch_dec(&cgroup_bpf_enabled_key);
>  	}
> +	bpf_cgroup_storage_link(storage, cgrp, type);
>  	return 0;
>  
>  cleanup:
> @@ -276,6 +295,9 @@ int __cgroup_bpf_attach(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct bpf_prog *prog,
>  
>  	/* and cleanup the prog list */
>  	pl->prog = old_prog;
> +	bpf_cgroup_storage_free(pl->storage);
> +	pl->storage = old_storage;
> +	bpf_cgroup_storage_link(old_storage, cgrp, type);
>  	if (pl_was_allocated) {
>  		list_del(&pl->node);
>  		kfree(pl);
> @@ -356,6 +378,8 @@ int __cgroup_bpf_detach(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct bpf_prog *prog,
>  
>  	/* now can actually delete it from this cgroup list */
>  	list_del(&pl->node);
> +	bpf_cgroup_storage_unlink(pl->storage);
> +	bpf_cgroup_storage_free(pl->storage);
>  	kfree(pl);
>  	if (list_empty(progs))
>  		/* last program was detached, reset flags to zero */
>