[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <906d48a5-6eaf-a152-1936-05670b0a6ae8@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2018 12:20:23 -0700
From: Sinan Kaya <okaya@...nel.org>
To: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/7] netdev: intel: Eliminate duplicate barriers on
weakly-ordered archs
+netdev,
On 7/30/2018 9:45 AM, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> I haven't had a chance to work on this much myself. My understanding
> is that igb has had the barriers updated, but I don't think any of the
> other drivers have been worked over yet.
Unfortunately, I have recently changed jobs and I no longer have the
hardware to test my changes. I thought that you wanted to handle this
yourself.
I haven't seen any follow ups. I wanted to double check.
I worked with several architecture leads on 4.17. All architectures
support the updated barrier semantics now. It is time to clean up the
network drivers.
92d7223a7423 alpha: io: reorder barriers to guarantee writeX() and
iowriteX() ordering #2
a1cc7034e33d MIPS: io: Add barrier after register read in readX()
f6b7aeee8f16 MIPS: io: Prevent compiler reordering writeX()
a71e7c44ffb7 io: change writeX_relaxed() to remove barriers
8875c5543761 io: change readX_relaxed() to remove barriers
cd0e00c10672 alpha: io: reorder barriers to guarantee writeX() and
iowriteX() ordering
87fe2d543f81 io: change inX() to have their own IO barrier overrides
a7851aa54c0c io: change outX() to have their own IO barrier overrides
755bd04aaf4b io: define stronger ordering for the default writeX()
implementation
032d59e1cde9 io: define stronger ordering for the default readX()
implementation
64e2c6738b4d io: define several IO & PIO barrier types for the
asm-generic version
Powered by blists - more mailing lists