[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180731055438.i5uf4yu6tt2uhsgj@breakpoint.cc>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2018 07:54:38 +0200
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
Peter Oskolkov <posk@...gle.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] inet: frag: enforce memory limits earlier
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> wrote:
> We currently check current frags memory usage only when
> a new frag queue is created. This allows attackers to first
> consume the memory budget (default : 4 MB) creating thousands
> of frag queues, then sending tiny skbs to exceed high_thresh
> limit by 2 to 3 order of magnitude.
>
> Note that before commit 648700f76b03 ("inet: frags: use rhashtables
> for reassembly units"), work queue could be starved under DOS,
> getting no cpu cycles.
> After commit 648700f76b03, only the per frag queue timer can eventually
> remove an incomplete frag queue and its skbs.
I'm not sure this is a good idea.
This can now prevent "good" queue from completing just because attacker
is sending garbage.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists