[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d11c65d8-20be-1a85-c687-c6f182264e41@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2018 09:39:08 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@....ntt.co.jp>
Cc: mst@...hat.com, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] virtio-net: get rid of unnecessary container
of rq stats
On 2018年07月31日 18:02, Toshiaki Makita wrote:
> On 2018/07/31 18:43, Jason Wang wrote:
>> We don't maintain tx counters in rx stats any more. There's no need
>> for an extra container of rq stats.
>>
>> Cc: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@....ntt.co.jp>
>> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
>> 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>> index 72d3f68..14f661c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>> @@ -87,7 +87,8 @@ struct virtnet_sq_stats {
>> u64 kicks;
>> };
>>
>> -struct virtnet_rq_stat_items {
>> +struct virtnet_rq_stats {
>> + struct u64_stats_sync syncp;
>> u64 packets;
>> u64 bytes;
>> u64 drops;
>> @@ -98,17 +99,8 @@ struct virtnet_rq_stat_items {
>> u64 kicks;
>> };
>>
>> -struct virtnet_rq_stats {
>> - struct u64_stats_sync syncp;
>> - struct virtnet_rq_stat_items items;
>> -};
> I'm not thinking removing sq stat is needed but even if it is I want to
> keep virtnet_rq_stats to avoid allocating unnecessary u64_stats_syncp on
> stack in virtnet_receive. I would just remove virtnet_rx_stats if necessary.
It's a nop on 64bit machines. And an unsigned on 32bit. So it's overhead
could be ignored I think.
Thanks
>> -
>> -struct virtnet_rx_stats {
>> - struct virtnet_rq_stat_items rx;
>> -};
>> -
Powered by blists - more mailing lists