[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180801.093219.1548098195820479887.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2018 09:32:19 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: f.fainelli@...il.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linville@...driver.com, andrew@...n.ch,
vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH ethtool] ethtool: Add support for WAKE_FILTER
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2018 15:26:24 -0700
> On 07/17/2018 08:36 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> Allow re-purposing the wol->sopass storage area to specify a bitmask of filters
>> (programmed previously via ethtool::rxnfc) to be used as wake-up patterns.
>
> John, David, can you provide some feedback if the approach is
> acceptable? I will address Andrew's comment about the user friendliness
> and allow providing a comma separate list of filter identifiers.
>
> One usability issue with this approach is that one cannot specify
> wake-on-LAN using WAKE_MAGICSECURE *and* WAKE_FILTER at the same time,
> since it uses the same location in the ioctl() structure that is being
> passed. Do you see this as a problem?
Once again we are stuck in this weird situation, a sort of limbo.
On the one hand, I don't want to block your work on the ethtool
netlink stuff being done.
However it is clear that by using netlink attributes, it would
be so much cleaner.
I honestly don't know what to say at this time. I wish I had
a clear piece of advice and a way for everyone to move forward,
and usually I do, but this time I really don't :-/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists