lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180801.093219.1548098195820479887.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Wed, 01 Aug 2018 09:32:19 -0700 (PDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     f.fainelli@...il.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linville@...driver.com, andrew@...n.ch,
        vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH ethtool] ethtool: Add support for WAKE_FILTER

From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2018 15:26:24 -0700

> On 07/17/2018 08:36 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> Allow re-purposing the wol->sopass storage area to specify a bitmask of filters
>> (programmed previously via ethtool::rxnfc) to be used as wake-up patterns.
> 
> John, David, can you provide some feedback if the approach is
> acceptable? I will address Andrew's comment about the user friendliness
> and allow providing a comma separate list of filter identifiers.
> 
> One usability issue with this approach is that one cannot specify
> wake-on-LAN using WAKE_MAGICSECURE *and* WAKE_FILTER at the same time,
> since it uses the same location in the ioctl() structure that is being
> passed. Do you see this as a problem?

Once again we are stuck in this weird situation, a sort of limbo.

On the one hand, I don't want to block your work on the ethtool
netlink stuff being done.

However it is clear that by using netlink attributes, it would
be so much cleaner.

I honestly don't know what to say at this time.  I wish I had
a clear piece of advice and a way for everyone to move forward,
and usually I do, but this time I really don't :-/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ