[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180802003101.GA19256@embeddedor.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2018 19:31:01 -0500
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>,
Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@...rix.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] xen-netback: use true and false for boolean values
Return statements in functions returning bool should use true or false
instead of an integer value.
This issue was detected with the help of Coccinelle.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
---
drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
index a27daa2..3621e05 100644
--- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
+++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
@@ -1603,9 +1603,9 @@ static void xenvif_ctrl_action(struct xenvif *vif)
static bool xenvif_ctrl_work_todo(struct xenvif *vif)
{
if (likely(RING_HAS_UNCONSUMED_REQUESTS(&vif->ctrl)))
- return 1;
+ return true;
- return 0;
+ return false;
}
irqreturn_t xenvif_ctrl_irq_fn(int irq, void *data)
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists