lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e26dbc04-d524-d3b2-7596-1428122f2cd5@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 2 Aug 2018 06:05:36 -0700
From:   Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:     Marcel Hellwig <mhellwig@...-group.com>,
        'Eric Dumazet' <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        "'davem@...emloft.net'" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "'kuznet@....inr.ac.ru'" <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
        "'yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org'" <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
        "'andrew@...n.ch'" <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     "'netdev@...r.kernel.org'" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "'linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Matthias Wystrik <mwystrik@...-group.com>
Subject: Re: AW: AW: AW: PROBLEM: Kernel Oops in UDP stack



On 08/02/2018 04:02 AM, Marcel Hellwig wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> 
> I did three things that evening.
> * I created a small dts file, so I could boot a 3.5.7 kernel.
> * Ported the pskb_expand_head from 3.5.7 to 3.4.113
> * Ported the whole skbuf.{c,h} file from 3.5.7 to 3.4.113

That seems bold :0)

Sorry, we only backport one fix at a time.

You can not simply copy whole files from one version to another.

> 
> Sadly enough the second and third one panicked as well, but interestingly not the first one (3.5.7 with a simple dts file). Now the question is: Is something changed outside of the skbuf (maybe in udp.{c,h}?) or is it because the dts uses a different approach of talking to the MAC of the lpc3250?
> 
> I may try a more recent kernel with a dts file (maybe a 4.x.x one), but I think that will be impossible to backport a patch for our 2.6 kernel :(
> 
> If anybody has any more ideas about why the dts kernel does not panic, you're very welcome.
> 
> Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards
> 
> Marcel Hellwig
> B. Sc. Informatik
> Entwickler
> 
> m-u-t GmbH
> Am Marienhof 2
> 22880 Wedel
> Germany
> 
> Phone:	+49 4103 9308 - 474
> Fax:  	+49 4103 9308 - 99
> mhellwig@...-group.com
> 
> www.mut-group.com
> 
> Geschäftsführer (Managing Director): Fabian Peters
> Amtsgericht Pinneberg (Commercial Register No.): HRB 10304 PI
> USt-IdNr. (VAT-No.): DE228275390
> WEEE-Reg-Nr.: DE 72271808
> 
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ