[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKA=qzaxDaC39rKw7y_Y8uEYS=5LfdvqbKSwmyuFZ6zM8ZtMzA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2018 12:33:34 -0700
From: Josh Hunt <joshhunt00@...il.com>
To: Peter Oskolkov <posk@...gle.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 0/3] ip: Use rb trees for IP frag queue
On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 4:34 PM, Peter Oskolkov <posk@...gle.com> wrote:
> This patchset
> * changes IPv4 defrag behavior to match that of IPv6: overlapping
> fragments now cause the whole IP datagram to be discarded (suggested
> by David Miller): there are no legitimate use cases for overlapping
> fragments;
> * changes IPv4 defrag queue from a list to a rb tree (suggested
> by Eric Dumazet): this change removes a potential attach vector.
>
> Upcoming patches will contain similar changes for IPv6 frag queue,
> as well as a comprehensive IP defrag self-test (temporarily delayed).
>
> Peter Oskolkov (3):
> ip: discard IPv4 datagrams with overlapping segments.
> net: modify skb_rbtree_purge to return the truesize of all purged
> skbs.
> ip: use rb trees for IP frag queue.
>
> include/linux/skbuff.h | 11 +-
> include/net/inet_frag.h | 3 +-
> include/uapi/linux/snmp.h | 1 +
> net/core/skbuff.c | 6 +-
> net/ipv4/inet_fragment.c | 16 +-
> net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c | 239 +++++++++++-------------
> net/ipv4/proc.c | 1 +
> net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_conntrack_reasm.c | 1 +
> net/ipv6/reassembly.c | 1 +
> 9 files changed, 139 insertions(+), 140 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.18.0.597.ga71716f1ad-goog
>
>
Peter
I just tested your patches along with Florian's on top of net-next. Things
look much better wrt this type of attack. Thanks for doing this. I'm
wondering if we want to put an optional mechanism in place to limit the
size of the tree in terms of skbs it can hold? Otherwise an attacker can
send ~1400 8 byte frags and consume all frag memory (default high thresh is
4M) pretty easily and I believe also evict other frags which may have been
pending? I am guessing this is what Florian's min MTU patches are trying to
help with.
--
Josh
Content of type "text/html" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists