netdev - Re: KCM - recvmsg() mangles packets?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180803232057.GB7583@nautica>
Date:   Sat, 4 Aug 2018 01:20:57 +0200
From:   Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>
To:     Tom Herbert <tom@...ntonium.net>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: KCM - recvmsg() mangles packets?

Tom Herbert wrote on Fri, Aug 03, 2018:
> struct my_proto {
>    struct _hdr {
>        uint32_t len;
>     } hdr;
>     char data[32];
> } __attribute__((packed));
> 
> // use htons to use LE header size, since load_half does a first convertion
> // from network byte order
> const char *bpf_prog_string = " \
> ssize_t bpf_prog1(struct __sk_buff *skb) \
> { \
>     return bpf_htons(load_half(skb, 0)) + 4; \
> }";
> 
> The length in hdr is uint32_t above, but this looks like it's being
> read as a short.

Err, I agree this is obviously wrong here (I can blame my lack of
attention to this and the example I used), but this isn't the problem as
the actual size is between 0 and 32 -- I could use any size I want here
and the result would the same.

A "real" problem with the conversion program would mean that my example
would not work if I slow it down, but I can send as many packet as I
want if I uncomment the usleep() on the client side or if I just
throttle the network stack with a loud tcpdump writing to stdout -- that
means the algorithm is working even if it's making some badly-sized
conversions.

(Just to make sure I did fix it to htonl(load_word()) and I can confirm
there is no difference)

Thanks,
-- 
Dominique Martinet