[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180806183219.GA78698@doronrk-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2018 11:32:19 -0700
From: Doron Roberts-Kedes <doronrk@...com>
To: Vakul Garg <vakul.garg@....com>
CC: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Dave Watson <davejwatson@...com>,
Boris Pismenny <borisp@...lanox.com>,
Aviad Yehezkel <aviadye@...lanox.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net/tls: Calculate nsg for zerocopy path
without skb_cow_data.
On Fri, Aug 03, 2018 at 11:49:02AM -0700, Doron Roberts-Kedes wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 03, 2018 at 01:23:33AM +0000, Vakul Garg wrote:
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Doron Roberts-Kedes [mailto:doronrk@...com]
> > > Sent: Friday, August 3, 2018 6:00 AM
> > > To: David S . Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> > > Cc: Dave Watson <davejwatson@...com>; Vakul Garg
> > > <vakul.garg@....com>; Boris Pismenny <borisp@...lanox.com>; Aviad
> > > Yehezkel <aviadye@...lanox.com>; netdev@...r.kernel.org; Doron
> > > Roberts-Kedes <doronrk@...com>
> > > Subject: [PATCH net-next] net/tls: Calculate nsg for zerocopy path without
> > > skb_cow_data.
> > >
> > > decrypt_skb fails if the number of sg elements required to map is greater
> > > than MAX_SKB_FRAGS. As noted by Vakul Garg, nsg must always be
> > > calculated, but skb_cow_data adds unnecessary memcpy's for the zerocopy
> > > case.
> > >
> > > The new function skb_nsg calculates the number of scatterlist elements
> > > required to map the skb without the extra overhead of skb_cow_data. This
> > > function mimics the structure of skb_to_sgvec.
> > >
> > > Fixes: c46234ebb4d1 ("tls: RX path for ktls")
> > > Signed-off-by: Doron Roberts-Kedes <doronrk@...com>
> > > ---
> > > net/tls/tls_sw.c | 89
> > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > > 1 file changed, 86 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > memcpy(iv, tls_ctx->rx.iv, TLS_CIPHER_AES_GCM_128_SALT_SIZE);
> > > if (!sgout) {
> > > - nsg = skb_cow_data(skb, 0, &unused) + 1;
> > > + nsg = skb_cow_data(skb, 0, &unused);
> > > + } else {
> > > + nsg = skb_nsg(skb,
> > > + rxm->offset + tls_ctx->rx.prepend_size,
> > > + rxm->full_len - tls_ctx->rx.prepend_size);
> > > + if (nsg <= 0)
> > > + return nsg;
> > Comparison should be (nsg < 1). TLS forbids '0' sized records.
>
> Yes true, v2 incoming
>
Glancing at this a second time, I actually don't believe this should be
changed. nsg <= 0 is equivalent to nsg < 1. Returning 0 if the record is
0 sized is the proper behavior here, since decrypting a zero-length skb
is a no-op. It is true that zero sized TLS records are forbidden, but it
is confusing to enforce that in this part of the code. I would be
surpised to learn that tls_sw_recvmsg could be invoked with a len equal
to 0, but if I'm wrong, and that case does need to be handled, then it
should be in a different patch.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists