[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPNVh5cbi37-ioegbGdO20R8LNRMOepuG_d3wRRMkaqvofuD4A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2018 12:29:10 -0700
From: Peter Oskolkov <posk@...gle.com>
To: dan.carpenter@...cle.com
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ipv4: frags: precedence bug in ip_expire()
Ack. Thanks, Dan!
On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 12:17 PM Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com> wrote:
>
> We accidentally removed the parentheses here, but they are required
> because '!' has higher precedence than '&'.
>
> Fixes: fa0f527358bd ("ip: use rb trees for IP frag queue.")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c b/net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c
> index 0e8f8de77e71..7cb7ed761d8c 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/ip_fragment.c
> @@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ static void ip_expire(struct timer_list *t)
> __IP_INC_STATS(net, IPSTATS_MIB_REASMFAILS);
> __IP_INC_STATS(net, IPSTATS_MIB_REASMTIMEOUT);
>
> - if (!qp->q.flags & INET_FRAG_FIRST_IN)
> + if (!(qp->q.flags & INET_FRAG_FIRST_IN))
> goto out;
>
> /* sk_buff::dev and sk_buff::rbnode are unionized. So we
Powered by blists - more mailing lists