[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6d4bb8b9-0e2f-85d5-4e8d-b5c17cfe1d90@synopsys.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2018 08:56:17 +0100
From: Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>,
Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 3/9] net: stmmac: Add DMA related callbacks
for XGMAC2
On 03-08-2018 19:58, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 08/03/2018 08:50 AM, Jose Abreu wrote:
>> Add the DMA related callbacks for the new IP block XGMAC2.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>
>> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
>> Cc: Joao Pinto <jpinto@...opsys.com>
>> Cc: Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>
>> Cc: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>
>> ---
>> + value &= ~XGMAC_RD_OSR_LMT;
>> + value |= (axi->axi_rd_osr_lmt << XGMAC_RD_OSR_LMT_SHIFT) &
>> + XGMAC_RD_OSR_LMT;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < AXI_BLEN; i++) {
>> + if (axi->axi_blen[i])
>> + value &= ~XGMAC_UNDEF;
> Should not you be you clearing all XGMAC_BLEN* values since you do a
> logical or here? I am assuming this is not something that would likely
> change from one open/close but still?
Yeah, this won't change between open/close but I will add the
mask anyway.
Thanks and Best Regards,
Jose Miguel Abreu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists