[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DM6PR02MB521168EB7AFB804AB12D9FB1C9270@DM6PR02MB5211.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2018 09:09:24 +0000
From: Harini Katakam <harinik@...inx.com>
To: Claudiu Beznea <Claudiu.Beznea@...rochip.com>,
Jennifer Dahm <jennifer.dahm@...com>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Nathan Sullivan <nathan.sullivan@...com>,
Rafal Ozieblo <rafalo@...ence.com>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
"'harinikatakamlinux@...il.com'" <harinikatakamlinux@...il.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH 0/2] net: macb: Disable TX checksum offloading on all
Zynq
Hi Claudiu,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Claudiu Beznea [mailto:Claudiu.Beznea@...rochip.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 7, 2018 2:21 PM
> To: Harini Katakam <harinik@...inx.com>; Jennifer Dahm
> <jennifer.dahm@...com>
> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; David S . Miller <davem@...emloft.net>; Nathan
> Sullivan <nathan.sullivan@...com>; Rafal Ozieblo <rafalo@...ence.com>;
> Harini Katakam <harinik@...inx.com>; Nicolas Ferre
> <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] net: macb: Disable TX checksum offloading on all
> Zynq
>
> Hi Harini,
>
> On 01.08.2018 15:53, Harini Katakam wrote:
> > Hi Jennifer,
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 10:21 AM, Harini Katakam <harinik@...inx.com> wrote:
> >> Hi Jeniffer,
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 8:35 PM, Nicolas Ferre
> >> <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com> wrote:
> >>> Jennifer,
> >>>
> >>> On 25/05/2018 at 23:44, Jennifer Dahm wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> During testing, I discovered that the Zynq GEM hardware overwrites
> >>>> all outgoing UDP packet checksums, which is illegal in packet
> >>>> forwarding cases. This happens both with and without the
> >>>> checksum-zeroing behavior introduced in
> >>>> 007e4ba3ee137f4700f39aa6dbaf01a71047c5f6
> >>>> ("net: macb: initialize checksum when using checksum offloading").
> >>>> The only solution to both the small packet bug and the packet
> >>>> forwarding bug that I can find is to disable TX checksum offloading
> entirely.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> Thanks for the extensive testing.
> >> I'll try to reproduce and see if it is something to be fixed in the driver.
> >>
> >>> Are the bugs listed above present in all revisions of the GEM IP,
> >>> only for some revisions?
> >>> Is there an errata that describe this issue for the Zynq GEM?
> >>
> >> @Nicolas, AFAIK, there is no errata for this in either Cadence or
> >> Zynq documentation.
> >
> > I was unable to reproduce this issue on Zynq.
> > Although I do not have HW with two GEM ports, I tried by routing one
> > GEM via PL and another via on board RGMII.
> > Since there was no specific errata related to this, I also tried on
> > subsequent ZynqMP versions with multiple GEM ports but dint find any
> > checksum issues. I discussed the same with cadence and they tried the
> > test with 2 bytes of UDP payload on the Zynq GEM IP version in their
> > regressions and did not hit any issue either.
> >
> > I tried to reach out earlier to see if you can share your exact
> > application. Could you please let me know if you have any further
> > updates?
>
> I manage to reproduce the issue and provide a patch for this (see patch 3/3 from
> [1]).
>
> [1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg513848.html
Sorry, I missed your series. Thanks.
Regards,
Harini
Powered by blists - more mailing lists