[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180807163630.GD2890@nanopsycho>
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2018 18:36:30 +0200
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...lanox.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, jhs@...atatu.com,
xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, pablo@...filter.org,
kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu, fw@...len.de, ast@...nel.org,
daniel@...earbox.net, edumazet@...gle.com, keescook@...omium.org,
marcelo.leitner@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 12/14] net: sched: act_mirred: remove dependency
on rtnl lock
Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 08:54:23AM CEST, vladbu@...lanox.com wrote:
[...]
>diff --git a/include/net/tc_act/tc_tunnel_key.h b/include/net/tc_act/tc_tunnel_key.h
>index 46b8c7f1c8d5..e6e475d788c6 100644
>--- a/include/net/tc_act/tc_tunnel_key.h
>+++ b/include/net/tc_act/tc_tunnel_key.h
>@@ -30,26 +30,47 @@ struct tcf_tunnel_key {
>
> static inline bool is_tcf_tunnel_set(const struct tc_action *a)
> {
>+ bool ret = false;
> #ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT
> struct tcf_tunnel_key *t = to_tunnel_key(a);
>- struct tcf_tunnel_key_params *params = rtnl_dereference(t->params);
>+ struct tcf_tunnel_key_params *params;
>
>+ rcu_read_lock();
>+ params = rcu_dereference(t->params);
> if (a->ops && a->ops->type == TCA_ACT_TUNNEL_KEY)
>- return params->tcft_action == TCA_TUNNEL_KEY_ACT_SET;
>+ ret = params->tcft_action == TCA_TUNNEL_KEY_ACT_SET;
>+ rcu_read_unlock();
> #endif
>- return false;
>+ return ret;
> }
>
> static inline bool is_tcf_tunnel_release(const struct tc_action *a)
Why are these tunnel things in a mirred patch?
[...]
> static struct net_device *tcf_mirred_get_dev(const struct tc_action *a)
> {
> struct tcf_mirred *m = to_mirred(a);
>+ struct net_device *dev;
>+
>+ rcu_read_lock();
>+ dev = rcu_dereference(m->tcfm_dev);
>+ if (dev)
>+ dev_hold(dev);
>+ rcu_read_unlock();
>
>- return rtnl_dereference(m->tcfm_dev);
>+ return dev;
> }
>
> static int tcf_mirred_delete(struct net *net, u32 index)
>diff --git a/net/sched/cls_api.c b/net/sched/cls_api.c
>index e8b0bbd0883f..0cce0eadc28b 100644
>--- a/net/sched/cls_api.c
>+++ b/net/sched/cls_api.c
>@@ -2167,6 +2167,7 @@ static int tc_exts_setup_cb_egdev_call(struct tcf_exts *exts,
> if (!dev)
> continue;
> ret = tc_setup_cb_egdev_call(dev, type, type_data, err_stop);
>+ dev_put(dev);
This looks really odd. a->ops->put_dev is needed.
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
> ok_count += ret;
>--
>2.7.5
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists