[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2018 14:13:19 +0200
From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@...ux.ibm.com>
To: davem@...emloft.net
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
schwidefsky@...ibm.com, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com,
raspl@...ux.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net 1/3] net/smc: no shutdown in state SMC_LISTEN
Invoking shutdown for a socket in state SMC_LISTEN does not make
sense. Nevertheless programs like syzbot fuzzing the kernel may
try to do this. For SMC this means a socket refcounting problem.
This patch makes sure a shutdown call for an SMC socket in state
SMC_LISTEN simply returns with -ENOTCONN.
Signed-off-by: Ursula Braun <ubraun@...ux.ibm.com>
---
net/smc/af_smc.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/smc/af_smc.c b/net/smc/af_smc.c
index 05e4ffe5aabd..1288c7bf40d5 100644
--- a/net/smc/af_smc.c
+++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c
@@ -1397,8 +1397,7 @@ static int smc_shutdown(struct socket *sock, int how)
lock_sock(sk);
rc = -ENOTCONN;
- if ((sk->sk_state != SMC_LISTEN) &&
- (sk->sk_state != SMC_ACTIVE) &&
+ if ((sk->sk_state != SMC_ACTIVE) &&
(sk->sk_state != SMC_PEERCLOSEWAIT1) &&
(sk->sk_state != SMC_PEERCLOSEWAIT2) &&
(sk->sk_state != SMC_APPCLOSEWAIT1) &&
--
2.16.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists