[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <99a17600-57c8-06fc-c555-83dc8793f174@fb.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2018 09:55:35 -0700
From: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
CC: <ast@...com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <kernel-team@...com>,
<jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf] bpf: fix bpffs non-array map seq_show issue
On 8/9/18 8:59 AM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 08/09/2018 05:15 PM, Yonghong Song wrote:
>> On 8/9/18 7:24 AM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>>> On 08/09/2018 05:55 AM, Yonghong Song wrote:
>>>> On 8/8/18 7:25 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 06:25:19PM -0700, Yonghong Song wrote:
>>>>>> In function map_seq_next() of kernel/bpf/inode.c,
>>>>>> the first key will be the "0" regardless of the map type.
>>>>>> This works for array. But for hash type, if it happens
>>>>>> key "0" is in the map, the bpffs map show will miss
>>>>>> some items if the key "0" is not the first element of
>>>>>> the first bucket.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This patch fixed the issue by guaranteeing to get
>>>>>> the first element, if the seq_show is just started,
>>>>>> by passing NULL pointer key to map_get_next_key() callback.
>>>>>> This way, no missing elements will occur for
>>>>>> bpffs hash table show even if key "0" is in the map.
>>>>
>>>> Currently, map_seq_show_elem callback is only implemented
>>>> for arraymap. So the problem actually is not exposed.
>>>>
>>>> The issue is discovered when I tried to implement
>>>> map_seq_show_elem for hash maps, and I will have followup
>>>> patches for it.
>
> Btw, on that note, I would also prefer if we could decouple
> BTF from the map_seq_show_elem() as there is really no reason
> to have it on a per-map. I had a patch below which would enable
> it for all map types generically, and bpftool works out of the
> box for it. Also, array doesn't really have to be 'int' type
> enforced as long as it's some data structure with 4 bytes, it's
> all fine, so this can be made fully generic (we only eventually
> care about the match in size).
I agree with a generic map_check_btf as mostly we only care about size
and this change should enable btftool btf based pretty print for
hash/lru_hash tables.
>
> From 0a8be27cbc2ac0c6fc2632865b5afe37222a1fc7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> Message-Id: <0a8be27cbc2ac0c6fc2632865b5afe37222a1fc7.1533830053.git.daniel@...earbox.net>
> From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
> Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2018 16:50:21 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf, btf: enable for all maps
>
> # bpftool m dump id 19
> [{
> "key": {
> "": {
> "vip": 0,
> "vipv6": []
> },
> "port": 0,
> "family": 0,
> "proto": 0
> },
> "value": {
> "flags": 0,
> "vip_num": 0
> }
> }
> ]
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
> ---
> include/linux/bpf.h | 4 +---
> kernel/bpf/arraymap.c | 27 ---------------------------
> kernel/bpf/inode.c | 3 ++-
> kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++----
> 4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
> index cd8790d..91aa4be 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bpf.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
> @@ -48,8 +48,6 @@ struct bpf_map_ops {
> u32 (*map_fd_sys_lookup_elem)(void *ptr);
> void (*map_seq_show_elem)(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
> struct seq_file *m);
> - int (*map_check_btf)(const struct bpf_map *map, const struct btf *btf,
> - u32 key_type_id, u32 value_type_id);
> };
>
> struct bpf_map {
> @@ -118,7 +116,7 @@ static inline bool bpf_map_offload_neutral(const struct bpf_map *map)
>
> static inline bool bpf_map_support_seq_show(const struct bpf_map *map)
> {
> - return map->ops->map_seq_show_elem && map->ops->map_check_btf;
> + return map->ops->map_seq_show_elem;
> }
>
> extern const struct bpf_map_ops bpf_map_offload_ops;
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c b/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c
> index 2aa55d030..67f0bdf 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c
> @@ -358,32 +358,6 @@ static void array_map_seq_show_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
> rcu_read_unlock();
> }
>
> -static int array_map_check_btf(const struct bpf_map *map, const struct btf *btf,
> - u32 btf_key_id, u32 btf_value_id)
> -{
> - const struct btf_type *key_type, *value_type;
> - u32 key_size, value_size;
> - u32 int_data;
> -
> - key_type = btf_type_id_size(btf, &btf_key_id, &key_size);
> - if (!key_type || BTF_INFO_KIND(key_type->info) != BTF_KIND_INT)
> - return -EINVAL;
> -
> - int_data = *(u32 *)(key_type + 1);
> - /* bpf array can only take a u32 key. This check makes
> - * sure that the btf matches the attr used during map_create.
> - */
> - if (BTF_INT_BITS(int_data) != 32 || key_size != 4 ||
> - BTF_INT_OFFSET(int_data))
> - return -EINVAL;
> -
> - value_type = btf_type_id_size(btf, &btf_value_id, &value_size);
> - if (!value_type || value_size != map->value_size)
> - return -EINVAL;
> -
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> const struct bpf_map_ops array_map_ops = {
> .map_alloc_check = array_map_alloc_check,
> .map_alloc = array_map_alloc,
> @@ -394,7 +368,6 @@ const struct bpf_map_ops array_map_ops = {
> .map_delete_elem = array_map_delete_elem,
> .map_gen_lookup = array_map_gen_lookup,
> .map_seq_show_elem = array_map_seq_show_elem,
> - .map_check_btf = array_map_check_btf,
> };
>
> const struct bpf_map_ops percpu_array_map_ops = {
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/inode.c b/kernel/bpf/inode.c
> index 76efe9a..400f27d 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/inode.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/inode.c
> @@ -332,7 +332,8 @@ static int bpf_mkmap(struct dentry *dentry, umode_t mode, void *arg)
> struct bpf_map *map = arg;
>
> return bpf_mkobj_ops(dentry, mode, arg, &bpf_map_iops,
> - map->btf ? &bpffs_map_fops : &bpffs_obj_fops);
> + bpf_map_support_seq_show(map) ?
> + &bpffs_map_fops : &bpffs_obj_fops);
There are an issue here, the condition bpf_map_support_seq_show(map) may
not be enough since the map specific implementation assumes availability
of btf and proper map key/value btf_type_id's.
We can either use
map->btf && bpf_map_support_seq_show(map)
condition here, or check map->btf in each individual implementation
of map_support_seq_show().
> }
>
> static struct dentry *
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> index 5af4e9e..0b6f6e8 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> @@ -455,6 +455,23 @@ static int bpf_obj_name_cpy(char *dst, const char *src)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int map_check_btf(const struct bpf_map *map, const struct btf *btf,
> + u32 btf_key_id, u32 btf_value_id)
> +{
> + const struct btf_type *key_type, *value_type;
> + u32 key_size, value_size;
> +
> + key_type = btf_type_id_size(btf, &btf_key_id, &key_size);
> + if (!key_type || key_size != map->key_size)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + value_type = btf_type_id_size(btf, &btf_value_id, &value_size);
> + if (!value_type || value_size != map->value_size)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> #define BPF_MAP_CREATE_LAST_FIELD btf_value_type_id
> /* called via syscall */
> static int map_create(union bpf_attr *attr)
> @@ -489,8 +506,7 @@ static int map_create(union bpf_attr *attr)
> atomic_set(&map->refcnt, 1);
> atomic_set(&map->usercnt, 1);
>
> - if (bpf_map_support_seq_show(map) &&
> - (attr->btf_key_type_id || attr->btf_value_type_id)) {
> + if (attr->btf_key_type_id || attr->btf_value_type_id) {
> struct btf *btf;
>
> if (!attr->btf_key_type_id || !attr->btf_value_type_id) {
> @@ -504,8 +520,8 @@ static int map_create(union bpf_attr *attr)
> goto free_map_nouncharge;
> }
>
> - err = map->ops->map_check_btf(map, btf, attr->btf_key_type_id,
> - attr->btf_value_type_id);
> + err = map_check_btf(map, btf, attr->btf_key_type_id,
> + attr->btf_value_type_id);
> if (err) {
> btf_put(btf);
> goto free_map_nouncharge;
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists